CEMP-E
TI 809-51
30 September 1999
Structural Review Score Sheet
High Seismicity Region (SDS > 0.500g, SD1>0.200g)
Station
Building No.
Year Designed
Facility Cat. No.
Building Name
Present Use
Initial Use
No. Stories
Total Floor Area
Reviewer
Date
SKETCH (Plan, Elevation and Section)
PHOTO
BUILDING FUNCTION
STRUCTURAL SCORES AND MODIFIERS
Building Type
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
No. Persons
Mess
Basic Score
5.0
4.5
4.5
3.0
5.5
3.5
2.5
2.0
3.0
2.5
2.0
2.5
2.5
2.0
1.0
Administration
Shops
0-10
2 to 4 Stories
-0.3
-0.3
-0.3
-0.3
N/A
-0.3
-0.5
-0.3
-0.5
-0.5
-1.0
-1.0
-1.0
-1.0
-1.0
Assembly
Poor Condition
-0.3
-0.3
-0.3
-0.5
-0.3
-0.3
-0.5
-0.5
-0.3
-0.5
-0.5
-0.5
-0.5
-0.5
-0.5
Hospital
11-100
Details*
Utility
Vert. Irregularity
-0.3
-0.3
-0.3
-0.5
N/A
-0.5
-0.5
-0.5
-0.8
-0.5
-1.0
-1.0
-0.5
-1.0
-0.5
Warehouse
100+
Soft Story
-0.5
-0.5
-0.5
-0.8
N/A
-0.8
-0.8
-0.8
-0.8
-0.8
-1.2
-1.2
-1.0
-1.2
-0.8
Torsion
-0.5
-0.5
-0.6
-1.0
-0.8
-0.8
-1.0
-0.8
-0.8
-1.0
-0.8
-1.0
-1.0
-1.0
-0.5
Seismic Use Group:
Plan Irregularity
-0.5
-0.5
-0.5
-0.8
-0.5
-0.8
-1.0
-0.8
-0.8
-1.0
-1.0
-1.0
-0.8
-1.0
-0.5
Diaphragm Discont.
-0.3
-0.3
-0.5
-0.8
-0.5
-0.8
-1.0
-0.8
-0.8
-1.0
-1.0
-1.0
-0.8
-0.8
-0.6
III E
SA, SB
+0.3
+0.3
+0.3
+0.3
+0.3
+0.3
+0.3
+0.3
+0.3
+0.3
+0.3
+0.3
+0.3
+0.3
+0.3
III H
SD
-0.6
-0.6
-0.6
-0.6
-0.6
-0.6
-0.6
-0.6
-0.6
-0.6
-0.6
-0.6
-0.6
-0.6
-0.6
II
SE, SF
-0.6
-0.6
-0.8
-0.8
-0.8
-0.8
-0.8
-0.8
-0.8
-0.8
-0.8
-0.8
-0.8
-0.8
-0.8
I
Final Score
COMMENTS/CONCLUSIONS:
Record dates and a brief description of additions and/or modifications (if any), poor condition or obvious structural
deficiencies (if any), narrative explanation of any discrepancies between the final structural score and the judgement of the reviewer, as well as comments that
may be useful in the evaluation process.
Note: *Subjective Evaluation of structural details varies from 1.0 to +1.0. Include explanation for detail modifier.
Figure B-2. Structural Review Score Sheet High Seismicity Region
B-8
Previous Page
